January 22, 2003

human shields and less freedom

israel supreme court has decided that if palistinians choose to that israeli armed forces can use them as human shields, now what kind of decision is that? who would volunteer for human shield duty? why would the court even make that ruling? besides, what good is a human shield if they are cooperating with the people they are shielding? wouldn't that make them traitors? and doesn't the us punish traitors with death? so how would that create any protection? if anything, it should make them bigger targets. and when reporters take pictures of human shields, israelis beat them

i find it interesting that blogs are mostly read by bloggers. it's just a great big community of people writting for people who write for them. it seems kind of recursive to me(not that that is a bad thing).

and kevin mitnik is back on the internet

us patriot act helps to drag the us back to the 60's. more eroding of our freedoms, and the system of checks and balances. and if echelon is reading this: 2600 bomb blackops terrorist militia Spyderco squib spook words warfare electronic warfare george bush kill assasinate subvert covert nuke

Posted by dshepard at January 22, 2003 01:08 PM
Comments

im totally intrigued by mitnik. thanks for the link.

Posted by: todd on January 22, 2003 02:08 PM
Post a comment



















netwerk-x.com
welcome to netwerk-x.com, your home for something not yet done       
gallery                  kplaylist                  infocom games                  news                  lvultimate                  div-zero                  old c-6
craps log
:-)
dollars
drinks
last time
$45
0
total
$502
42